Initially, the Institute of Human Reproduction advised the patient to obtain a court order before proceeding with the ART procedure.
Meghalaya HC Acts on Guwahati Clinic’s Treatment of 50-Year-Old Patient
The Meghalaya High Court has raised serious concerns regarding the handling of a 50-year-old woman’s request for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) treatment at a fertility clinic in Guwahati. The woman challenged the age limit of 50 years set by the ART Regulation Act, 2021, seeking treatment beyond the prescribed age. The court strongly criticized the clinic for its approach and lack of clarity on the matter.
Initially, the Institute of Human Reproduction advised the patient to obtain a court order before proceeding with the ART procedure. However, the clinic later claimed it lacked the necessary resources to even evaluate the woman’s case. This conflicting stance has raised significant doubts about the clinic’s competency and dedication to patient care.
In a letter dated February 5, 2025, the fertility institute admitted it did not possess a “multispecialty team” to form a medical board for assessing the woman’s eligibility for treatment. Despite specializing in mother and child services, the clinic’s failure to offer the required team has put its credibility under scrutiny. This revelation has sparked serious concerns about its ability to provide safe and effective ART procedures.
Read More: Union Budget 2025-26: Rs 19,499 Crore Allocated For Road Development In Northeast India
In response to these issues, Meghalaya High Court has directed the head of the institute to submit an affidavit by the upcoming hearing. The affidavit must include a detailed assessment of the patient’s medical condition. It should also address the risks and benefits associated with performing the ART procedure on the 50-year-old woman. The court has made it clear that if the institute fails to submit a satisfactory response by the deadline, it could face severe consequences. This includs a potential ban on all ART procedures at the clinic.
This development could have serious ramifications for the clinic. The court’s warning of a possible ban on ART procedures highlights the importance of maintaining proper medical facilities and procedures. Fertility clinics are expected to provide high standards of care. This case emphasizes the need for clarity and transparency in patient handling. The case is scheduled for a hearing on February 20, 2025. The clinic’s response to the court’s directives will be closely scrutinized. Depending on the outcome, the future of ART services at the institute could be in jeopardy.
Read More: Sikkim New ‘Mero Rukh Mero Santati’ Initiative: A Step Towards Combating Population Decline
